Financial Planning for 'Middle England'
Talking about tax
Engaging with the RDR
The fossilisation of value
The RRR is much more important
You couldn't make it up
Why are we in business?
A question of priorities
UK plc's uneasy relationship with debt
The art of reinvention
Life, Intelligent Life and...Insurance Companies
What price independence?
The smokescreen of complaint management
A contract you don't want
The clients you don't want
Upfront about reviews?
The inequities of long-term care - in microcosm
IFAs and the latest buzzword
Who ya gonna call?
The UK Complaint Culture
Another Sorry Saga
Fiddling...
Worth getting angry about?
Are we missing a trick?
Negative inflation - doesn't apply to us!
When governments default
The limited benefits of regulation
What happens if we don't market ourselves?
Lessons from Pension-Switching
Is small the new big?
The Banks and our clients
What if?
The death of indemnity commission
From the sublime to the ridiculous
Shooting ourselves in the foot
Careful Complaint Management
Friday afternoon irritations
Ruminating about Risk
Wales Fast Growth 50
Fiat Money Magic!
New regulatory horizons beckon...
Mourning old friends
Lame man banking
'Wall Street indices predicted nine out of the last five rec
Somebody...please regulate this sector!
Think and grow rich
If it's not about integrity, then...
Bearish works for me
Having the right impact
Enforcement is the new Big Thing
Well thank goodness that's over...
A demon of our own design?
A new national religion?
In a typical week...
The shrill cries of anguish
It's simpler, but will it be better?
Health warnings: reading the financial press
Unsustainable?
It's a crazy world
What's it worth?
CGT Changes and Simplistic Arguments
Waste...and more waste
Bank of England: Armageddon Scenarios?
With-Profits...again
Financial Risk Outlook 2008
CAR (Customer Agreed Remuneration)
Service is optional
Customers not consumers
Business tough in 2008?
Getting Tough on TCF
What is 'Primary Advice'?
RDR - Feedback Submission
Welcome to KevBlog!
RSS Feed for latest articles

IFAs and the latest buzzword

It seems that, wherever one looks, our profession is in the grip of one key, driving concept, summed up by one semi-plausible word:  consolidation.  Last week, I was visiting a new firm of accountants planning to join our network, and they showed me an example of the advice being given to one of their clients by one of the largest, longest-established, and most professional IFA firms in the area.

 

The suitability letter milked that word (consolidation) for all it was worth.  You would have thought that the mere act of transferring a basket of assets from one pension to another must have some kind of profound magical effect.  Given the nature of the two companies involved, this seemed a dubious contention, but the IFA was clearly encouraging the client to suspend all critical faculties in order to...consolidate.  Look into my eyes...consolidate...consolidate...

 

Nowhere in the suitability report, did the IFA even bother to analyse the deficiencies of the old arrangement, although a few bland aphorisms were trotted out..."underperformance"..."higher charges"...without any supporting data.  There was no spreadsheet of attaching analysis - and the case would have failed on virtually every one of the FSA's criteria for replacement pension contracts.

 

For me, this summed up the depressing state of our industry.  Intermediaries get away with doing lazy, unproductive product-churning, but provided the client is not disadvantaged nobody appears to care all that much.  Perish the thought that we would actually be able to demonstrate some advantage to the client from the process.

 

In fact, the cynicism of the adviser was palpable in that suitability letter.  The client was being switched from one, old-model, traditional insurer to another old-model, traditional insurer, with the justification being a Synaptics analysis based upon product terms.  There was not even the pretence of a transition to a new-model platform for handling the investment.

 

Coincidentally, I have spent the last few weeks reviewing a range of 'old-style' pension arrangements with companies such as Scottish Widows, Norwich Union, NPI, Axa and Friends Provident.  To say that the medium to long-term results from these contracts are underwhelming would be to cast an overly favourable gloss over the tawdry and valueless benefits which (generally) had accrued to the clients concerned.  When a nineteen-year policy is barely returning the contributions paid, you know something is profoundly wrong.

 

So, perversely, I do think that there is an argument in favour of consolidation - I just happen to think it has to be a much stronger one than those examples that I routinely come across.  If this bothers you, and you really do want to get it right, then you can download my checklist by clicking here.


Kevin Moss, 13/08/2009

Feedback:
David Jeffreys26/08/2009 13:28
Kevin - you may like to note that the PFS course I attended in May actively promoted the concept of pensions consolidation as a valuable service with a potentially sizeable market, as yet largely overlooked by the profession.
David Jeffreys
Kevin Moss27/08/2009 18:08
It's a valid thought. Unfortunately, in practice the concept is being hijacked by lazy exponents as a tool for extracting more revenues out of existing clients, without delivering quantifiable improvements to their circumstances. Clearly, there are justifiable reasons for adopting this approach, but there needs to be more substance to it than the somewhat theoretical concept of 'consolidation. Kevin